After Davis-Monthan Leaves
A lot of folks, particularly in the business community, breathed a major sigh of relief this year when Davis-Monthan Air Force Base was spared by the Defense Department’s latest round of Base Realignment & Closure (BRAC). The base is a huge contributor to our local economy with money and jobs.
But at what cost? The price to save DM was the declaration of 8,500 homes in Central Tucson as “incompatible with residential use”. Residents are worried that their homes will become unlivable and their investment in those homes will become worthless as increasing numbers of noisier planes fly more frequently throughout the day and night. We all saw an Air Force jet crash in a residential subdivision in Yuma earlier this year; when will our luck run out in central Tucson? And what is the economic price of all this on homeowners and business owners in the city? Is it worth the benefits that the base provides to our economy? Perhaps it’s time to do that calculation.
Especially because we may not have a choice to save the base next time the BRAC comes around in a few years.
I recently spoke to a friend of mine in the Air Force, and he told me that it is general knowledge among insiders that DM’s days as a base are numbered because of the development which has been encouraged on the southeast side of the base. The boneyard and some other sections might stay, but most flight operations will move out to a less urban base to more effectively achieve Defense Department goals.
If this is true, then we should get our heads out of the sand now. It’s time to make lemons out of lemonade, and that’s exactly what other communities who have lost their bases are doing.
The Defense Department’s official BRAC FAQ page tells us that “A base closure can actually be an economic opportunity, especially when all elements of a community work together.” They give these examples:
(1) Charleston Naval Base, S.C. — The local community, assisted by DoD, was able to create approximately 4,500 new jobs. Approximately 90 private, state and federal entities are currently reusing the former naval base.
(2) Pease Air Force Base, New Hampshire More than 185 operating tenants currently established at the Pease International Tradeport (PIT). The PIT has been designated a Foreign Free Trade Zone by the U.S. Department of Commerce, and has developed an air cargo access capability via an 11,300 foot runway. There is in excess of 3,800,000 square feet of new, or newly renovated space, that has supported the creation of over 5,000 jobs, in biotechnology (Lonza Biotechnics), education (Southern New Hampshire University), in addition to a wide variety (Pan Am, Marriott, Redhook Brewery) of retail and professional service availability day-to-day.
(3) Fort Devens, Mass. — More than 3,000 new jobs have been generated and 2.7 million square feet of new construction has occurred. With 68 different employers on site, redevelopment ranges from small business incubators to the Gillette Corp., which occupies a large warehouse/distribution center and manufacturing plant.
Generally, bases in high-growth areas like Tucson do better at conversion, but even rural bases, with advance planning, have a track record of gaining more jobs than they lost. Loring AFB in Maine near the Canadian border went from 1,100 base-related jobs to 1,500 civilian jobs after the base left.
The former Lowry AFB in suburban Denver now boasts a $4 billion economic impact from 3,000 homes in a New Urbanist community, two million square feet of commercial space, and a community college campus for 10,000 students, all of which is now taxable, unlike the base. Lowry is now a national model for alternatives to urban sprawl.
The Defense Department will clean up all environmental hazards on their dime, and offers much more money to help planning efforts, retrain employees, and attract new businesses.
Progressive developers all over the country are partnering with cities to create win-win solutions and replace defense jobs with clean, quiet, higher paying business jobs and innovative mixed-use communities. There is a lot of knowledge available to help us make the right moves. It’s time we stop begging DM to stay, and plan for how we can benefit when the base leaves.

October 12th, 2005 at 3:31 pm
While I’d like to remain optimistic that such successful base conversion would be possible in Tucson, past and current leadership has taken an antogonist approach to progressive action. Should the base leave, it may be a catalyst to revitalize decaying older neighborhoods and apartment living around the base. Parks, research facilities, and new urban housing are all options; however, our first priority should be to advocate for JLUS to alter the flightpath to a SE loop and have the city/county ban growth in that radius. They will have to give up their precious new growth tax base and developer impact fees, and perhaps will look towards the current city boundary for internal improvements. $750 million was the most recent figure I could find on economic impact. Tucson’s quality of life, proud, historic military service, and economic viability can survive, if only people like Fred play ball for the citizens instead of against. Hopefully his short-sightedness will be short lived.
October 16th, 2005 at 3:22 pm
Too bad current leaders in AZ are doing little except laying down for DM’s ease. Total lack of creativity from most pols who are more interested in sucking DM’s welfare tit until it runs dry.
October 20th, 2005 at 9:05 am
I am pleased to see someone questioning the continued prescence of D-M in Tucson. Our AZ elected politicans from the Congress, the Governor’s office, the county and the city do not have the forssight or guts to bring the subject up. In the long term Tucson and Pima County would be better off without the base. It would provide better jobs, improve the quality of life, and allow for local control of the property.
A suggested topic would be: the essential need for term limits for the Congress.
March 10th, 2006 at 11:17 am
WHere is everybody?
It is March 2006. At this very moment heavy AF air traffic is screaming over my head.
MOre to come they say.
Will my house be determined incompatible as more and more air traffic comes this way?
How can we stop this nonsense?